{ "schema_version": 1, "decision_source": "data/collapse_decisions.json", "generated_by": "scripts/build_longform_dossier.py", "recorded_on": "2026-07-30", "summary": { "source_units": 218, "initially_visible_source_units": 57, "initially_collapsed_source_units": 161, "context_groups": 50, "manual_substantive_overrides": 76, "automatic_context_decisions": 85, "response_cap_policy_count": 1 }, "response_height_cap": { "reason_code": "response_exceeds_source_height", "measurement": "runtime rendered pixels", "condition": "The full response clip exceeds the height available after response metadata and controls are placed beside the source.", "fallbacks": [ "The complete response is present when JavaScript is unavailable.", "Print exposes the complete response.", "A deep link into hidden response material expands it.", "The reader can select Show full response." ], "reason": "A response is initially capped only when its rendered content exceeds the height available beside its Leuchter passage. The cap preserves source-response alignment; the complete response remains in the HTML and expands on request, for deep links, in print, or without JavaScript.", "audit_question": "Does the cap conceal the response's controlling evidence or create a misleading first impression at any supported viewport?", "runtime_metadata_attributes": [ "data-response-collapse-state", "data-response-collapse-reason-code", "data-source-height-px", "data-response-full-height-px", "data-response-cap-px" ] }, "context_groups": [ { "group_id": "context-LR1-024-P01-LR1-024-P03", "section": "3.0", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-024-P01", "LR1-024-P02", "LR1-024-P03" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-024-P04-LR1-024-P04", "section": "3.1", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-024-P04" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-025-P01-LR1-025-P01", "section": "3.1", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-025-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "peripheral_side_issue" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-025-P02-LR1-025-P02", "section": "3.2", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-025-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "credential_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-025-P04-LR1-025-P04", "section": "3.3", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-025-P04" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-025-P06-LR1-026-P01", "section": "3.3", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-025-P06", "LR1-026-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-027-P01-LR1-027-P01", "section": "3.5", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-027-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-027-P04", "LR1-027-P05", "LR1-027-P06", "LR1-027-P07", "LR1-027-P08" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-027-PH01", "LR1-027-P09", "LR1-027-P10", "LR1-027-P11", "LR1-027-P12" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-029-P02-LR1-029-P02", "section": "3.6", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-029-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-029-P03-LR1-029-PH01", "section": "3.7", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-029-P03", "LR1-029-PH01" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-029-PH02-LR1-029-PH02", "section": "3.7", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-029-PH02" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-030-PH01-LR1-030-P03", "section": "3.7", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-030-PH01", "LR1-030-P02", "LR1-030-P03" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-031-P01-LR1-031-P01", "section": "3.7", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-031-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-031-P03", "LR1-031-P04", "LR1-032-P01", "LR1-032-P02", "LR1-032-P03", "LR1-032-P04", "LR1-032-P05" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-032-P06-LR1-033-P02", "section": "3.9", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-032-P06", "LR1-032-P07", "LR1-033-P01", "LR1-033-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "adjacent_answer", "peripheral_side_issue", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-033-P04-LR1-034-P02", "section": "3.9", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-033-P04", "LR1-034-P01", "LR1-034-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "adjacent_answer", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-035-P01-LR1-035-P04", "section": "3.11", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-035-P01", "LR1-035-P02", "LR1-035-P03", "LR1-035-P04" ], "reason_codes": [ "peripheral_side_issue", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-036-P03-LR1-036-P03", "section": "3.11", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-036-P03" ], "reason_codes": [ "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-037-P01-LR1-037-P02", "section": "3.12", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-037-P01", "LR1-037-PH01", "LR1-037-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-039-PH01-LR1-039-PH01", "section": "3.12", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-039-PH01" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-040-P02-LR1-040-P02", "section": "3.12", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-040-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-041-PH01", "LR1-041-PH02", "LR1-041-P04", "LR1-042-P01", "LR1-042-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "administrative_source", "peripheral_side_issue" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-042-P04-LR1-042-P05", "section": "3.13", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-042-P04", "LR1-042-P05" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-044-P01-LR1-044-P01", "section": "3.13", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-044-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-044-P02-LR1-044-PH01", "section": "3.14", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-044-P02", "LR1-044-PH01" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-045-P02-LR1-045-P03", "section": "3.14", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-045-P02", "LR1-045-TAB01", "LR1-045-P03" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-046-P04-LR1-046-PH01", "section": "3.14", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-046-P04", "LR1-046-PH01" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-047-PH01-LR1-047-PH02", "section": "3.15", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-047-PH01", "LR1-047-PH02" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-049-P03-LR1-049-TAB01", "section": "3.15", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-049-P03", "LR1-049-TAB01" ], "reason_codes": [ "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-050-PH01-LR1-050-PH02", "section": "3.16", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-050-PH01", "LR1-050-P01", "LR1-050-P02", "LR1-050-PH02" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-051-TAB01-LR1-052-P01", "section": "3.16", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-051-TAB01", "LR1-052-P01" ], "reason_codes": [ "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-053-P01", "LR1-053-P02", "LR1-053-P03", "LR1-053-P04", "LR1-053-TAB01", "LR1-053-P05" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-053-PH01", "LR1-053-P06", "LR1-053-PH02", "LR1-053-P07", "LR1-054-PH01" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-054-PH02", "LR1-054-P03", "LR1-054-P04", "LR1-055-P01", "LR1-055-P02" ], "reason_codes": [ "adjacent_answer", "administrative_source", "qualified_context", "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-056-P01-LR1-056-TAB01", "section": "3.17", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-056-P01", "LR1-056-TAB01" ], "reason_codes": [ "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-056-P02-LR1-056-P03", "section": "3.18", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-056-P02", "LR1-056-P03" ], "reason_codes": [ "qualified_context", "repeated_calculation" ] }, { "group_id": "context-LR1-056-P06-LR1-056-P07", "section": "3.19", "unit_ids": [ "LR1-056-P06", "LR1-056-P07" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "credential_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-040-DISTRIBUTION-APP-040-DISTRIBUTION", "section": "A.0", "unit_ids": [ "APP-040-DISTRIBUTION" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH-APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH", "section": "A.2", "unit_ids": [ "APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH" ], "reason_codes": [ "visual_corroboration" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "unit_ids": [ "APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES", "APP-043-NI9912-EXPLOSION", "APP-043-NI9912-WARM-BLOODED", "APP-043-NI9912-INSECTS", "APP-044-NI9912-PLANTS", "APP-044-NI9912-METHOD", "APP-044-NI9912-SLIGHT-POISONING", "APP-044-NI9912-PRESCRIPTION", "APP-044-NI9912-SEVERE-POISONING", "APP-044-NI9912-SKIN", "APP-044-NI9912-STOMACH", "APP-045-NI9912-FILTER", "APP-045-NI9912-PERSONNEL-ONE", "APP-045-NI9912-PERSONNEL-TWO", "APP-045-NI9912-MEMBER-EQUIPMENT", "APP-045-NI9912-SQUAD-EQUIPMENT", "APP-045-NI9912-UPKEEP", "APP-046-NI9912-PLANNING", "APP-046-NI9912-PREPARATION", "APP-046-NI9912-TIME", "APP-047-NI9912-FUMIGATION", "APP-047-NI9912-AIRING-INTRO", "APP-048-NI9912-AIRING-LIST", "APP-048-NI9912-PROVISIONAL-RELEASE", "APP-048-NI9912-CLEANUP", "APP-049-NI9912-FINAL-RELEASE", "APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "administrative_source", "appendix_corroboration", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP-APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP", "section": "A.4", "unit_ids": [ "APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP", "APP-051-BIRKENAU-MAP", "APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP" ], "reason_codes": [ "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-053-DRAWING-APP-054-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "unit_ids": [ "APP-053-DRAWING", "APP-054-DRAWING" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-056-DRAWING-APP-058-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "unit_ids": [ "APP-056-DRAWING", "APP-057-DRAWING", "APP-058-DRAWING" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "visual_corroboration" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-059-LETTER-HEADER-APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.6", "unit_ids": [ "APP-059-LETTER-HEADER", "APP-059-LETTER-OPENING", "APP-059-LETTER-VENTS", "APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "appendix_corroboration", "credential_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING", "section": "A.7", "unit_ids": [ "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER", "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-RECOMMENDATION", "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "credential_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-DATE-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-OPENING", "section": "A.8", "unit_ids": [ "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-DATE", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-OPENING" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "appendix_corroboration" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "unit_ids": [ "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE7", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE-LIST", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-LITIGATION", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-STORAGE", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SPEED", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "appendix_corroboration", "credential_context", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "unit_ids": [ "APP-062-CERT-TITLE", "APP-062-CERT-LAB", "APP-062-CERT-PRIMARY", "APP-062-CERT-SECONDARY", "APP-062-CERT-SCOPE", "APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE" ], "reason_codes": [ "accurate_context", "administrative_source", "appendix_corroboration", "qualified_context" ] }, { "group_id": "context-APP-063-L022-TITLE-APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE", "section": "A.10", "unit_ids": [ "APP-063-L022-TITLE", "APP-064-L022-NOTE", "APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE" ], "reason_codes": [ "administrative_source", "peripheral_side_issue", "qualified_context" ] } ], "source_unit_decisions": [ { "unit_id": "LR1-024-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-024-P01-LR1-024-P03", "section": "3.0", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 14 ], "source_excerpt": "In February of this year (1988), I was contacted by Dr. Robert Faurisson for Mr. Ernst Zundel and asked to consider an assignment to investigate and forensically evaluate the extant crematoria and alleged execution gas chambers operated by the Nazis in Poland and to render an engineering opinion as to their feasibility", "source_text_sha256": "7dbfe89d90466e6800611174c09ca5c631ae1a5cc6856c4fcb4e75cb9cb26793", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-024-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-024-P01-LR1-024-P03", "section": "3.0", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 14 ], "source_excerpt": "After a meeting with Mr. Zundel, defense lawyer Douglas H. Christie and staff members, in which the project was discussed, I was told that my findings were to be used in conjunction with the case of the Queen v Zundel, then before the District Court in Toronto.", "source_text_sha256": "2709e7a502e129a1f96e05ce10e5711b5e215e68d6de6abfb45d523113656c95", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-024-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-024-P01-LR1-024-P03", "section": "3.0", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 14 ], "source_excerpt": "Understanding this, it was determined that the investigation would include Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek (Lublin), and all associated crematoria and alleged execution gas chambers. I accepted the assignment and on February 25, 1988, I led a party of investigators to Poland. This party consisted of myself; my wife Ca", "source_text_sha256": "d53f73e3ddefd7662d37ed11c00e83461d4ed9e98e571ce1f2224652c817dc55", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-024-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-024-P04-LR1-024-P04", "section": "3.1", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 11 ], "source_excerpt": "The purpose of this report and the investigation upon which it is based is to determine whether the alleged execution gas chambers and crematory facilities at three (3) sites in Poland, namely Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, could have operated in the manner ascribed them in Holocaust literature.", "source_text_sha256": "bc14de78a31dd50dfbac061638dbd045f10a0d23718a5aef54a6f157fefc970a", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A legitimate question, framed with a loaded premise", "candidate_response_sha256": "cedf5c44d716be109372ea03a94b7beaf0dbd1d73bbc5d432ce04fe3ce031def", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-025-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-025-P01-LR1-025-P01", "section": "3.1", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 11 ], "source_excerpt": "This purpose does not include a determination of any numbers of persons who died or were killed by means other than gassing or as to whether an actual Holocaust occurred. It, further, is not the intent of this author to redefine the Holocaust in historical terms, but simply to supply scientific evidence and information", "source_text_sha256": "daea4f9bba65c192735043c047b88810f10bf85c9f60636ee6350f918a6ff39d", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The disclaimer does not match the conclusion the report actually reaches", "candidate_response_sha256": "af3a47b367a60040a52721b53215555c56c8e5d814da940db7309975ab24e862", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "peripheral_side_issue", "reason": "The criticism is supportable but peripheral to the report's chemical, engineering, documentary, or capacity case. It is retained for audit without competing with the main evidentiary route.", "audit_question": "Would omitting the response leave a consequential historical or technical inference unanswered?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-025-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-025-P02-LR1-025-P02", "section": "3.2", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 11 ], "source_excerpt": "The principal investigator and author of this report on design and fabrication of execution hardware has specifically worked on and designed hardware in the United States used in the execution of condemned persons by means of hydrogen cyanide gas.[See the Third Leuchter Report: A Technical Report on the Execution Gas", "source_text_sha256": "c97e59870062830ab03f369a8008fcc00cc3dac729e12193decf1606bc65cca3", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Experience with execution equipment did not make him a licensed engineer or a specialist in these fields", "candidate_response_sha256": "fb44a57cceee5d1f70174dd641cfd6fba5264eafc42be8f8d21f9d2dffd8f768", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "credential_context", "reason": "The point concerns Leuchter's title, experience, or institutional endorsement rather than a technical premise needed to test the report's conclusions.", "audit_question": "Is the credential claim being used at this point as substantive evidence that requires a direct answer?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-025-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-025-P04-LR1-025-P04", "section": "3.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 12 ], "source_excerpt": "The scope of this report includes a physical inspection and quantitative data obtained at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, literature supplied by the officials at the three (3) museum sites, blueprint copies of Kremas I, II, III, IV and V obtained at the museums, material relative to DEGESCH delousing chambers and fac", "source_text_sha256": "905d6f1c5bcfb89279f0957d060fb16664f85820e75bc378f9604963021de88f", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This inventory of materials is descriptive, not proof of completeness", "candidate_response_sha256": "2b0ff3a22a2f78e1372aea50368e6dbb982ce9cb4f12b69c0d3dec2ab7d6bd72", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-025-P06", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-025-P06-LR1-026-P01", "section": "3.3", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 12 ], "source_excerpt": "(a) the capability of the alleged execution gas chambers to have accomplished the mass murder of human beings by the use of Zyklon B gas in Auschwitz I and Birkenau and carbon monoxide and/or Zyklon B gas in Majdanek;", "source_text_sha256": "4796bc6fdc616e84c0d10e98d98e330a7063697e83b68df305f7db224608bd30", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Capability is a proper question, but it must be answered installation by installation", "candidate_response_sha256": "c7bf9de6326b7dbac654c081eae25fd7c0f6a144dff421d90b8daef2992ebda8", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-026-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-025-P06-LR1-026-P01", "section": "3.3", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 12 ], "source_excerpt": "(b) the capability of the investigated kremas to have accomplished the alleged number of human cremations in the alleged time period.", "source_text_sha256": "b1164136fe6a5afed89e280190d468e8e8022c41199c39528e93f57d1da80e99", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Cremation capacity is testable, but the report chooses the wrong operating model", "candidate_response_sha256": "0f13d1dd67daf3f68a936ccf72ce13e2c7dc60f575c933517b9444ebbcbce1fc", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P01-LR1-027-P01", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 12 ], "source_excerpt": "The procedures involved in the study and forensic analysis which resulted in the report were as follows:", "source_text_sha256": "07f1f785d772eec9854c8b7b17015ecf75b96a73b215226e4a447833a14fe6b1", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A numbered workflow is not yet a reproducible protocol", "candidate_response_sha256": "082c3ca2dd47873f20c3dab0698737e40c0c3b24067d8bbfed82fcf838f5d821", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 12 ], "source_excerpt": "3. A consideration of recorded and visual (on-site) logistic data.", "source_text_sha256": "c2eecd288f6f4af6f29e3866fcbe775936efb8bd327ba308d23a769f9ab23507", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The “logistic data” are not defined or tied to a measurement model", "candidate_response_sha256": "51ab99779dca556154f596c56c85c15852948f2fca4e3156c196e57a2d0c0b59", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-027-P02", "LR1-027-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P05", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "4. A compilation of the acquired data.", "source_text_sha256": "cebadf8d69774d3fc17c16d9e44849ff115497349730b79393ae65bb14f372d8", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Compilation is a clerical step, not validation", "candidate_response_sha256": "3e4645409e48228e86e3eeb41116cfd6f73c0f4be03dd548d310157894f0806d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P06", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "5. An analysis of the acquired information and comparison of this information with known and proven design, procedural and logistic information and requirements for the design, fabrication and operation of actual gas chambers and crematories.", "source_text_sha256": "ab05933c6791f02530fac5321060f3ae4fd45510d900e2fab893efc0c7f98d3a", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The “known and proven” comparator is a different machine built for a different operating regime", "candidate_response_sha256": "d4993416b7de9a46be2dcc3c6a7fb9d05311ce2015fbdcd0740676afa0fa83e0", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-025-P05" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P07", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "6. A consideration of the chemical analysis of the materials acquired on site.", "source_text_sha256": "a585bb538fc431d1685947695f53307749537358e96cfa85fc2a8d7d03be5d95", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "A laboratory number cannot repair a defective sampling design", "candidate_response_sha256": "c6de520c43baf84a0992f15e2c07d33406078a7f2a8b1b13a6e50228ad0011cc", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-027-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P08", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-P04-LR1-027-P08", "section": "3.5", "source_kind": "list_item", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "7. Conclusions based on the acquired evidence.", "source_text_sha256": "3d7d8e089fb10d58364c27fe93000fc43ff6417bf91cfa234cf63a217e56c47a", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Conclusions are warranted only to the extent the preceding method survives", "candidate_response_sha256": "ea82ba87ae2b74b8793faee1c997cdc34c2b053e378e01ed19dbb46e010f931b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "Zyklon B: A commonly used pesticide.", "source_text_sha256": "ec56b52799c16af3399d74a63fa06028e853731c1c8bc927432e580a7ff00d77", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P09", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "Hydrogen cyanide gas (HCN or hydrocyanic acid) has been utilized as a fumigant since before WWI. It has been used side by side with steam and hot air and during WWII with D.D.T. by the United States and its Allies.", "source_text_sha256": "91756055301b4c8e613c82aa3fa15ac7af383920b6254baa9ae1de3aae300830", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "HCN's long use as a fumigant is true background", "candidate_response_sha256": "d40c7ea12ac8d1a04d72cd16a45ab446b46e616c567b63f6cc69b4f6fa14db4b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P10", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "HCN is generally manufactured by a chemical reaction of sodium cyanide with dilute sulfuric acid. The chemical reaction results in HCN being given off into the air with a remainder of prussic acid (hydrocyanic acid). This reaction is normally contained in a ceramic crock pot.", "source_text_sha256": "f67244c04ac8a892e60927f4529b6b716353c95691ac823846bdfd2ef9a3ed70", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The generation reaction is real, but “HCN” and “prussic acid” are not two residues", "candidate_response_sha256": "0012520da4b9e410867939f815f95d7a25bb8644ce948693da809f0ac03f43c9", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-028-P01", "LR1-028-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P11", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "This procedure has been utilized for pest and vermin control on ships, in buildings and in specially designed chambers and structures. Special design and handling considerations must be followed to ensure the safety of the users (technicians). Hydrogen cyanide is one of the most powerful and dangerous of all fumigation", "source_text_sha256": "95a73165a8a4398aba1fc8850fcb792642837f27b9bebdc307046156615a46e6", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The safety warning is sound; the universal design claim is too broad", "candidate_response_sha256": "5e8e88b9316e3b370ec2aea32347ff2d5cb0ed4643a9b1671adc7d42d52ecbd3", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-028-P01", "LR1-029-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-027-P12", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-027-PH01-LR1-027-P12", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 13 ], "source_excerpt": "Special chambers were used since WWI in Europe and the United States. Some of these chambers were used by the German Army in Europe before and during WWII and much earlier by the United States Immigration Service at Ellis Island, New York Harbor. Many of these fumigation chambers were made for DEGESCH, a German firm lo", "source_text_sha256": "a779f5479eade8428bed566b1ad8abb21832e9f15df5ae012c2cf772a5466b93", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Special fumigation chambers and DEGESCH distribution are not in dispute", "candidate_response_sha256": "ca05f595c28ce0a28c790a6648df6beb061fe2ac339275c4ded18012c966501f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-029-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-029-P02-LR1-029-P02", "section": "3.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 14 ], "source_excerpt": "The specifications for the gas are found in Table 1:", "source_text_sha256": "cf5c808c090e640d3a44c8f98c5d8622c668776f81b5b3d88b8a6e8952ef83c7", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The table is a reference point, not an argument", "candidate_response_sha256": "fe987cac7bea8071d11ee320102d26d64b827faed6661fb0a98048c8aae4247a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-029-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-029-P03-LR1-029-PH01", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 15 ], "source_excerpt": "A fumigation facility, whether a building or a chamber, must adhere to the same basic requirements. It must be sealable, heatable, have both circulation and exhaust capability for the air, must have a sufficiently high stack for the exhaust and a means for distribution of the gas evenly (likewise the Zyklon B material)", "source_text_sha256": "211169104edb8598f19d0275a536c21f94ce599b523034382f6f04f00e671eff", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Useful design goals are presented as universal prerequisites", "candidate_response_sha256": "6505fac53120d7395417c46d8b9776d0de19b017d72340ac479a9b9bc6ab17bc", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04", "LR1-030-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-029-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-029-P03-LR1-029-PH01", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 15 ], "source_excerpt": "Execution Gas Chamber at the Mississippi State Penitentiary; high exhaust stack on the death house.", "source_text_sha256": "4355aea5869b9c4771e7877214aeea8cd0e4cf15cf3a2cd5203e68f7c9b41ef4", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-029-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-029-PH02-LR1-029-PH02", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 15 ], "source_excerpt": "Gas Chamber at the Mississippi State Penitentiary.", "source_text_sha256": "fc878f689c47ba2a21ea2d0965c0461a32cc5ec11e44c0ebc87abfa580db1b6c", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-030-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-030-PH01-LR1-030-P03", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 16 ], "source_excerpt": "Controls used by United States gas chambers.", "source_text_sha256": "272dfa26837ccd232dd6c085eec329ebf06e6a9194f55341f92095e44ac9a577", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-030-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-030-PH01-LR1-030-P03", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 16 ], "source_excerpt": "Third, the chamber or structure must have a means for evacuating the poisonous air/gas mixture and replacing it with fresh air. Generally, this is done with an exhaust or intake fan with either exhaust or intake valves or louvered ports of sufficient size to allow reasonable air change per hour. Usually, a sufficient c", "source_text_sha256": "573c41dd3e76569ee2a104f7693bcecbf647243157b2d9911daa0cadad56622e", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Ventilation is necessary for reuse; the stated timing is only an example", "candidate_response_sha256": "721276ad8f8c29bca8f6d3252f8c0d9f074ad6a6a1d99b43031afa4cde999604", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-030-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-030-PH01-LR1-030-P03", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 16 ], "source_excerpt": "The exhaust must be vented at a safe distance above the facility where the air currents can disperse the gas. This is normally 40 feet above the structure, but it should be more if the structure is sheltered from the wind. If an incinerator is used, the stack may be only several feet in height. It is generally too cost", "source_text_sha256": "e70ca673d31e7b4c54c2cd25a33e30209e669d567ea8f2b2c89169ec680b6a6c", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The forty-foot stack is an asserted American convention, not a wartime necessity", "candidate_response_sha256": "c47331a05d7daaad41d6784c4f5400bcf5356d0fd4cf9c6d5c7d2823824dbb4f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "LR1-030-P04" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-031-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P01-LR1-031-P01", "section": "3.7", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 16, 17 ], "source_excerpt": "Additionally, a check of the air inside the building must be done to determine whether all of the HCN has been removed. The test may be either by gas detector or by the copper acetate/benzidene test. In the former, an electronic readout is provided with detection to 10 ppm. In the other, a benzidene solution is mixed w", "source_text_sha256": "42244902d1fb90c183890d1917e9f6d4a09571cfb0e5ff3644b1def753dd8f18", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Testing the air is sound practice, and Auschwitz ordered gas detectors", "candidate_response_sha256": "37c1f834aeb30ed3822a6e04b62bc2f3fd2c6a735e72f3428aa64f23fba80ccf", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "LR1-051-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-031-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 17 ], "source_excerpt": "This generator employs an electrically heated water jacket to pre-boil HCN in a cylindrical vessel. At the time of use, the HCN is already vaporized and is released through valves into the chamber. A nitrogen burst system clears the plumbing after use. The total time of the execution is less than four minutes. The cham", "source_text_sha256": "f18f3a21da3a885f45fd7d5a254363471be3bbe86aa4fdac67d9e67ab133a408", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The proposed Missouri vaporizer answers a different design brief", "candidate_response_sha256": "47260a13997d0a39b47d4832dcedba9611cdaed7bf2e4707beb68c07872139ed", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-031-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 17 ], "source_excerpt": "The chamber may be of welded steel construction or of plastic PVC. The doors and windows should be of standard marine watertight construction. The door is gasketed with a single handle pressure seal. All lighting and electrical hardware is explosion- proof. The chamber contains the gas distribution plumbing, the gas ge", "source_text_sha256": "ff95511f8fd2367c7ef86dfaa1a416b27a656b6c52429fc4566e1d11fb1e6ba0", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Marine doors and explosion-proof electrics are prudent choices, not universal tests", "candidate_response_sha256": "4200e4a1539135b6ad4965b2000c12fc4a413a21b4fb8b82dce8f3cf5a6d7d7b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 17 ], "source_excerpt": "Because the chamber contains so lethal a gas, it is operated at a negative pressure to guarantee that any leak would be inward. The chamber pressure is controlled by a vacurizer system which should hold the chamber at a partial vacuum of 10 pounds per square inch (psi) (operational: 8 psi plus 2 psi of HCN). The negati", "source_text_sha256": "d7150ac86a8fa286d99d3dc5ebc721b05fb3794f74507b252294ab5f1bc59adc", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Negative pressure reduces leakage; it is not what makes HCN lethal", "candidate_response_sha256": "84a4e09dae730a8fda7325b6e787f1587d7a9237d3cd36a390332d923e34ddc5", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 17 ], "source_excerpt": "The inlet and exhaust system is designed for an air change every two (2) minutes. The air is supplied by a 2000+ cfm fan on the inlet side of the chamber and exhausted through the top of the chamber. The inlet and exhaust valves are both of the inwardly closing type to prevent vacuum loss and are timed to electrically ", "source_text_sha256": "092c28be8b11e11cf01c51bdfd7cf7f298d592870114f648faaeb2ef5eb1adc0", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Rapid American clearance cannot be converted into a universal forty-foot-stack rule", "candidate_response_sha256": "7fc18ce952c1c57647166843f5e412da898a83a72a5382c0564db954e78b25db", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 17, 18 ], "source_excerpt": "Gas detectors are utilized for safety. First, in the chamber where it will electrically prohibit the door from opening until the chamber is safe, second, outside the chamber in the witness and personnel areas where they sound alarms and initiate an air exhaust and intake system to protect the witnesses, as well as, abo", "source_text_sha256": "0cf05bae4ea1456cd7f5cd846299becf979df5c0d5fc66e4eaecc0a50f698626", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Detectors are sensible, and the camp construction file records them", "candidate_response_sha256": "6576fe5406e9f56f8050464774bb49602cbcf48061a3cfba7249ccd30cf621e9", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "LR1-051-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "Further, emergency breathing apparatus (air tanks) is available in the chamber area, as well as, special HCN first aid kits, emergency medical equipment for HCN and a resuscitator in an adjacent area for medical personnel.", "source_text_sha256": "88b63ec1258df97422874508c6f28e08e4536cdcdcd763d91c0521b90b701ef1", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Emergency equipment protects staff; its absence would not prove the chamber incapable of killing", "candidate_response_sha256": "1f28b04d3bc20ffa9db4c9f4d2000e5d2a2a62990f09115bdfbd0be8f080d4d7", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P05", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-031-P03-LR1-032-P05", "section": "3.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "Execution gas chamber design requires the consideration of many complicated problems. A mistake in any area may, and probably will, cause death or injury to witnesses or technicians.", "source_text_sha256": "fd2e6d2a77e346c60bfab851fe09726ab20cceb9885b055d660d0730f7573ae1", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "HCN is dangerous to operators, but danger is not impossibility", "candidate_response_sha256": "3966428983808e2e4bbdde18a49885b637efa3409311653f7df769dde013594f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P06", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-032-P06-LR1-033-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "The first gas chamber for execution purposes was built in Arizona in 1920. It consisted of an airtight chamber with gasketed doors and windows, a gas generator, an explosion proof electrical system, an air intake and exhaust system, provision for adding ammonia to the intake air and mechanical means for activating the ", "source_text_sha256": "78c7e411776fc932fc92585da35c6fe49a910df263a251aa9619197fc5862860", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "The first United States lethal-gas execution was in Nevada in 1924", "candidate_response_sha256": "ebd7fe0efdf2f22cafdd739b4cf3ecc2428028493e791a4baaf46983e70c2ab8", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "peripheral_side_issue", "reason": "The criticism is supportable but peripheral to the report's chemical, engineering, documentary, or capacity case. It is retained for audit without competing with the main evidentiary route.", "audit_question": "Would omitting the response leave a consequential historical or technical inference unanswered?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-032-P07", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-032-P06-LR1-033-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "The gas generator consisted of a crockery pot filled with a dilute solution (18%) of sulfuric acid with a mechanical release lever. The chamber had to be scrubbed with ammonia after the execution, as did the executee. Some 25 13-gram sodium cyanide pellets were used and generated a concentration of 3200 ppm in a 600 cu", "source_text_sha256": "5871a3b8d762a620b20a6721bf95a57424906db929a23c81623f000cafa9b437", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This is a description of American generator practice, not a test of Zyklon B", "candidate_response_sha256": "17b5eaa84f297895c360935add15a261f955a9a40f3918f77a0d08e81194022a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-033-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-032-P06-LR1-033-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "In the years that followed, other states adopted the HCN gas chamber as a mode of execution and design techniques changed. Eaton Metal Products designed, built and improved most of the chambers. Most had two chairs and were fitted with a vacuum system to guarantee a negative pressure and only inward leakage. All system", "source_text_sha256": "699521bfcab8caa6cf7356476101cf9742883b6aa253c0f66d19532efc90c8e8", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "American prisons' choice not to use Zyklon B does not test wartime capability", "candidate_response_sha256": "5a2fef984cc9aff4db60cbc0696b3b9629c755e5b1ff5bc903a3f3213619ef4c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-033-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-032-P06-LR1-033-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 18 ], "source_excerpt": "The reason for this is quite simple. Zyklon B takes too long to evaporate (or boil off) the HCN from the inert carrier and requires heated air and a temperature controlled system. Not only is the gas not instant, but a danger of explosion always exists.", "source_text_sha256": "42ed20648eca97bb81c486930b1713e27a1598bd56867eeeb007bbe4fa514bed", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "Slower desorption is not incapacity, and explosion is not automatic", "candidate_response_sha256": "128781fed344cbcaedcb682cd951ab600767b256256600b6e893abd1668bf511", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-028-P02", "LR1-033-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-033-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-033-P04-LR1-034-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 19 ], "source_excerpt": "Zyklon B, which would seem on the surface to have been a more efficient means of supplying gas and eliminating the prussic acid residue problem, was not the solution to the problem. In fact, the use of Zyklon B would have increased the execution time and therefore lengthened the time for handling the dangerous gas and,", "source_text_sha256": "8dc5ecd68ee4970d5cfc06aea375a1c009b1ed358305945c41319d390806edd0", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The asserted leakage and heater dangers are not quantified", "candidate_response_sha256": "fe36ac5a606e72b8e068f89a1200f7618d47455609cd9387c1091e5577981c81", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04", "LR1-030-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-034-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-033-P04-LR1-034-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 19 ], "source_excerpt": "In the United States, Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, and North Carolina have utilized gas as a mode of execution. But because of the inherent dangers in handling the gas and the expensive maintenance costs for the equipment used, some states (Nevada, North Carolina a", "source_text_sha256": "38acf9480a12b388716d2514a5c95ccb8adae73e52f201f0d2ad06fe20678cc8", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This American survey does not establish the claimed expertise or the Auschwitz standard", "candidate_response_sha256": "65c56925377a173df951bddcdce707694fedc6bcc6392e65cd2a68d6cac1f218", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-034-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-033-P04-LR1-034-P02", "section": "3.9", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 19 ], "source_excerpt": "In any event, because of the cost of manufacture of HCN gas, and because of the excessive hardware and maintenance costs of the equipment, gas has been in the past, and still is, the most expensive mode of execution.", "source_text_sha256": "4d4f38958254816aeb8fad30b9fb7903c7669d4b6dac6e20c2bacbf7cb7973c5", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The expense of American gas executions has no bearing on historical feasibility", "candidate_response_sha256": "e45f8fcad589475c2a292b7f091eabc610adbb6cbd4c5afcb6b93801c0a35feb", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-035-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-035-P01-LR1-035-P04", "section": "3.11", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 20 ], "source_excerpt": "Based on material available to the author, it has been determined that the Germans allegedly constructed a series of large (three or more executees) gas chambers for execution purposes beginning sometime in late 1941 and utilized them until late 1944.", "source_text_sha256": "97004458d2bdede7e5ce1c5ece463a1f6d87726edb93f4037e5319c9630e8cdb", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The date range is broadly right; “allegedly” is rhetoric, not analysis", "candidate_response_sha256": "f31600bbbc3a149066f640ef02577ce6fff8f4789b0f7361c1efc56cedd5e654", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-035-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-035-P01-LR1-035-P04", "section": "3.11", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 20 ], "source_excerpt": "Beginning with the first alleged gassing in a basement at Auschwitz I, two converted farmhouses at Birkenau (Auschwitz II) known as the Red and White houses or Bunkers 1 and 2, Krema I at Auschwitz, Kremas II, III, IV and V at Birkenau and an experimental facility at Majdanek, these facilities allegedly utilized hydroc", "source_text_sha256": "259564f6c2a8dc822db272ce78bd2969702f6245a77a1adbc9bb4f16ad0080be", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The site list is broadly recognizable but collapses distinct facilities", "candidate_response_sha256": "5ad8022aae0ad1d0d64e15faafce755098889c7688ce7937fe0eb5c53272e84f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-035-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-035-P01-LR1-035-P04", "section": "3.11", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 20 ], "source_excerpt": "According to official literature obtained at the Auschwitz and Majdanek State Museums, these execution facilities were located in concentration camps constructed in highly industrial areas and their inmates supplied forced labor to the factories producing materials for the war effort. These facilities also included cre", "source_text_sha256": "c2485071b00c6ca24858aab43cb1b2cae0651c76ac6f746cde042baae5b33de4", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Forced labor and extermination coexisted; industrial location does not negate killing", "candidate_response_sha256": "351714e72576145fc6fa6a1b764f98715767e828e893d88dad623b6a4ed2d03d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "peripheral_side_issue", "reason": "The criticism is supportable but peripheral to the report's chemical, engineering, documentary, or capacity case. It is retained for audit without competing with the main evidentiary route.", "audit_question": "Would omitting the response leave a consequential historical or technical inference unanswered?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-035-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-035-P01-LR1-035-P04", "section": "3.11", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 20 ], "source_excerpt": "Additionally, other alleged facilities which only utilized CO as the execution gas were located at Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka and Chelmno (gas vans). These additional facilities were allegedly destroyed either during or after WWII, have not been inspected and are not directly the subject of this report.", "source_text_sha256": "4813244fa54dcfd3cd0e507ae6fef1f9ee119580cb1e1328b9f242c72fb0dcf3", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The Operation Reinhard camps lie outside the inspection and cannot be dismissed from it", "candidate_response_sha256": "6c5292ba2fdc0efc992cface239bf537f915919f3760077eb665d4348f05775c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-036-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-036-P03-LR1-036-P03", "section": "3.11", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 21 ], "source_excerpt": "Krema I at Auschwitz, Kremas II, III, IV and V at Birkenau, and the existing crematory at Majdanek were allegedly crematories and gas chambers combined. The Red and White houses at Birkenau were allegedly only gas chambers. At Majdanek, the experimental gas chambers were not adjacent to a crematory and there was a sepa", "source_text_sha256": "1bd9d1b7217e70bbcaa188a2dba7d01651c2395b6136153709ec50de50512f58", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The basic site relationships are descriptive, not exculpatory", "candidate_response_sha256": "0209720dceff3a86e06a8d7988eaebe720323e6c73a25c752446c8f2b3aabe0d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-037-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-037-P01-LR1-037-P02", "section": "3.12", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 21 ], "source_excerpt": "It appears, through investigation of the available historical documents and the facilities themselves, that most of the alleged execution gas chambers were converted from an earlier design, purpose and structure. This is true except for the so-called experimental chambers at Majdanek, which were allegedly specifically ", "source_text_sha256": "af2d2bad65c31a27872c0e0c71f466e16833c3fc5fcb18b95c26ef2c54fdf424", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Conversion from another use is not evidence of incapacity", "candidate_response_sha256": "2cbfe728f08db0939b04048131ed8006bfe508468bf1b61cc591b1a3354e18fa", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-037-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-037-P01-LR1-037-P02", "section": "3.12", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 21 ], "source_excerpt": "Aerial view of Auschwitz I camp along the Sola River.", "source_text_sha256": "a92d6c56f822183b5d73ac6f8694aaea0f267ec0b667546a9cc47f79a496e523", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-037-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-037-P01-LR1-037-P02", "section": "3.12", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 21 ], "source_excerpt": "Bunkers I and II are described in Auschwitz State Museum literature as converted farm houses with several chambers and windows sealed. These do not exist in their original condition and were not inspected. Kremas I, II, III, IV and V are described historically and on inspection were verified to have been converted mort", "source_text_sha256": "3d7c2a16139ec75968e91877c72cea5d02ab1ba02123f0744d8c3fbbd9688162", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "The general description contains correct conversions and false claims about the fittings", "candidate_response_sha256": "aa926a7209be454367199922aad0fb7ed63d9331b28d628e1c76c696d6f11f4d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-038-P01", "LR1-039-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-039-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-039-PH01-LR1-039-PH01", "section": "3.12", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 22 ], "source_excerpt": "View of Majdanek.", "source_text_sha256": "0efbe111e5f15bfee33acd9283e495befabd46dbd4e8eedefa8dc3b46713d8d5", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-040-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-040-P02-LR1-040-P02", "section": "3.12", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 23 ], "source_excerpt": "It, like the other facilities, is not designed for, or capable of being used as, an execution gas chamber. In the back of this building are the experimental gas chambers. This area includes a breezeway, control booth and two chambers allegedly used as gas chambers. A third room was sealed and not available for inspecti", "source_text_sha256": "bff556958838a3a1908f453db48a7b7ac596201cf40ef749eed06aa5ffddd42d", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The observed fittings point toward gas handling; Leuchter dismisses them by importing his checklist", "candidate_response_sha256": "e52d0fc897a53d8b59bfaa6cc5e900deaa9d6011be8ee957864e9a2e0fd6242d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-040-P01", "LR1-041-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-041-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 24 ], "source_excerpt": "Modern crematories.", "source_text_sha256": "dec946023f3550d6d9d687573d118f0f2007af46d585a6b684d7eb143eb368e2", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-041-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 24 ], "source_excerpt": "Crematory buildings in Dachau, Germany.", "source_text_sha256": "9cb5437d17cd91a0886f49e9e42a8a24bfb334ad1cebe76384900c27316ee6b6", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-041-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 24 ], "source_excerpt": "A consideration of crematories, both old and new, must be made to determine the functionability of the German Kremas at accomplishing their attributed tasks.", "source_text_sha256": "dc3ace07b8e4a3fc25f64ba0c4e8382dc6286a802066aee1f9ebedc4b19324c7", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Cremation technology is relevant, but the operating comparison must match", "candidate_response_sha256": "6029f10419e026dd46a907f565f72902727285f51d23f9912fd3755ccf86100d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-042-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 24 ], "source_excerpt": "Cremation of the dead is not a new concept. It has been practiced by many cultures for many centuries. Although practiced several thousand years ago, it was frowned upon by the Catholic Church and not practiced recently until the Church relaxed its opposition in the later part of the 18th century.", "source_text_sha256": "b7f5bb8a70aa523c9940e8f0d382d23592b859c2d1fced21351206e8f098d04f", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "The Catholic chronology is wrong and has no bearing on furnace capacity", "candidate_response_sha256": "2927349270d13ed647d10d200051b6b4c524680d4517b5430efce63ee2fab33a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "peripheral_side_issue", "reason": "The criticism is supportable but peripheral to the report's chemical, engineering, documentary, or capacity case. It is retained for audit without competing with the main evidentiary route.", "audit_question": "Would omitting the response leave a consequential historical or technical inference unanswered?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-042-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-041-PH01-LR1-042-P02", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 24 ], "source_excerpt": "Cremation was forbidden by Orthodox Judaism. By the early 1800's Europe was again practicing cremation on a limited basis. It becomes advantageous to control disease, free up much needed land in crowded areas and eliminate the need for storing corpses in winter when the ground is frozen. Europe's early crematories were", "source_text_sha256": "b469eecba8801696503a55f78f12c9d74ffde03a160d5c3eb4c662b82a6e4a59", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Cultural attitudes and general motives do not establish an operating rate", "candidate_response_sha256": "c1c1264ee99037c130915423e0b40a3f6094ad0b181e251fdb3d240d174f2060", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-042-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-042-P04-LR1-042-P05", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 24, 25 ], "source_excerpt": "Earlier retorts were simply a drying or baking kiln and simply dried the human remains. Modern retorts of brick-lined steel actually blow fire from a nozzle onto the remains setting them afire, causing combustion and rapid burning. Modern retorts also have a second or afterburner for reburning all the pollutants in the", "source_text_sha256": "04430132d86af338bc1598971dffe411e88f19ddc49d8dfd46d622d82bd446a8", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "Bodies and containers contribute emissions; pollution is not entirely the fossil fuel", "candidate_response_sha256": "cbd556b609567bfe742f59d7a5b856acc87531018dfbcbcfd8a086d1729d54f9", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-042-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-042-P05", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-042-P04-LR1-042-P05", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 25 ], "source_excerpt": "These modern retorts or crematories burn at a temperature of 2000+ degrees Fahrenheit, with an afterburner temperature of 1600 degrees Fahrenheit. This high temperature causes the body to combust and consume itself, allowing for the burner to be shut down. Wooden caskets and paper boxes are burned with the body, today,", "source_text_sha256": "1846a7fa28496cf47e106e26e824ea3982204cad3df90124825df1d038355491", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Modern temperature examples do not create a historical minimum", "candidate_response_sha256": "25682229a2aab734deb24929ba590de1a6bff68f75c85a7d6a98fc0df02bd514", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-044-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-044-P01-LR1-044-P01", "section": "3.13", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 25 ], "source_excerpt": "The crematories utilized at the inspected German facilities were of the older type. They were constructed of red brick and mortar and lined with a refractory brick. All of the ovens had multiple retorts, some were blowered (although none had direct combustion), none had afterburners and all were coke fired except one f", "source_text_sha256": "b97fd162f7be40e5ae63630e9c98599242cb36eeb417eeb723c18017300000c4", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "Physical description is mixed with an unsupported design limitation", "candidate_response_sha256": "2f39efb60a39783afbd6955689d6f1811806c0f93191b084a040a6a92d550c03", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-043-P01", "LR1-043-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-044-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-044-P02-LR1-044-PH01", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 26 ], "source_excerpt": "As stated earlier, forensic samples of brick, mortar, concrete and sediment were selectively taken from sites in Poland. Cyanide and cyanide compounds may remain in a given location for long periods of time and if they do not react with other chemicals, may migrate around in brick and mortar.", "source_text_sha256": "8294cdd927e604c9d4c5c8467275fdebe984539b487f599f56285c5a47bfdaa2", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Cyanide compounds can persist or move; that variability defeats a simple concentration ranking", "candidate_response_sha256": "8cf77b339b55620aad40d3409355dd21e15ccea6a37a6ba60ea96152ac93554e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-044-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-044-P02-LR1-044-PH01", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 26 ], "source_excerpt": "Fred Leuchter taking samples from the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz.", "source_text_sha256": "fc9cc4eabbd58f2d96a6c7258fc2a150e5630f1f6cc5e918e8e4b0ba5bbd205d", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-045-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-045-P02-LR1-045-P03", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 27 ], "source_excerpt": "The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set out in Table III.", "source_text_sha256": "e84befad73ff9f402b3f6167b4a39ba15a02829c105c075001b89ab01c33e18e", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A location table does not supply the missing sample geometry", "candidate_response_sha256": "7b472e93b1120529c8788d72559c6a43e15876b8fec6db1c7ec95e60ee682577", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-045-TAB01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-045-P02-LR1-045-P03", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 27 ], "source_excerpt": "Table III: Locations of analyzed samples.", "source_text_sha256": "ec51956e91124239a54f13dcabf28cde0aaa195483774ac805066c43a9d219ed", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-045-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-045-P02-LR1-045-P03", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 27 ], "source_excerpt": "It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the few that were positive were very close to the detection level (1 mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 79 mg/kg at Krema I. The absence of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as compared with the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg suppo", "source_text_sha256": "516e65954d86cad21ba8b8f42acb32b8731ef81d9017febce1264efd42cb0894", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "Low bulk results do not show that the rooms were merely deloused", "candidate_response_sha256": "81888e1530723d594336cfd1abe0603ef5c0902383bd9cfd2ede94466e500a80", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-046-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-046-P04-LR1-046-PH01", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 28 ], "source_excerpt": "Additionally, the author will discuss the alleged burning (cremation) pits in this section.", "source_text_sha256": "8bb5e1304700bd39e79ad0cd4b71be015f08d3ea66cd905327137819e641b283", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This is only a transition to the burning-pit claim", "candidate_response_sha256": "5725d59b3aaf6cfaf7d68ce9bc0c0651a59eefe26dd84a270786002f0fbfb6c3", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-046-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-046-P04-LR1-046-PH01", "section": "3.14", "source_kind": "photo and caption", "source_pages": [ 28 ], "source_excerpt": "Alleged burning pits in Birkenau, with the report's full argumentative caption.", "source_text_sha256": "f516e1aaef0c2fcd8bea11ac9126debb0afaea3d2c1937044245e7090b1061ae", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The caption's camera-position argument proves nothing", "candidate_response_sha256": "53f8a4dfd65d0adcec0725c02cb337fb6f77edaa4ad42ecdd3eed7cae876372d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-047-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-047-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-047-PH01-LR1-047-PH02", "section": "3.15", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 28 ], "source_excerpt": "Uncaptioned Krema I interior photograph embedded in the report text.", "source_text_sha256": "cf9aac3c4a919f5ae7bbd67d2478e3e78447962aece45e13a75d2635fdf4f95f", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-047-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-047-PH01-LR1-047-PH02", "section": "3.15", "source_kind": "photo composite", "source_pages": [ 29 ], "source_excerpt": "Krema I roof overview and close-up, with the report's embedded captions.", "source_text_sha256": "43d049c00c78318ccf901ab72ccc83d63db24145343d7aa52a72e70b81bd5973", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-049-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-049-P03-LR1-049-TAB01", "section": "3.15", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "Computed theoretical and real-time usage rates of Krema I and alleged execution gas chamber at maximum capacity are set out in Table IV.", "source_text_sha256": "a0c177328cb8c07463e0fea57b1944608fdad14921c28f5224934105a45c00e1", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Table IV can only reproduce the assumptions fed into it", "candidate_response_sha256": "9519408e5b10220a11c97d1748149327557f2a9f4dbf07f6ac416c8340365f45", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-047-P03", "LR1-049-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-049-TAB01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-049-P03-LR1-049-TAB01", "section": "3.15", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "Table IV: Hypothetical execution and crematory usage rates of Krema I.", "source_text_sha256": "553c65b4e8170311e61fbba200f51a097f82691e607ad414a46481aab6712828", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "The weekly rate is the report's assumptions restated as a table", "candidate_response_sha256": "857029359a24afc849db9f3c64028dabbcbeb86ab14aec364e070a2ceecab205", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-047-P03", "LR1-049-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-050-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-050-PH01-LR1-050-PH02", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "Air photograph of Birkenau taken May 31, 1944.", "source_text_sha256": "acb05fde3886217f578603f8c9e1137e4c285161640ed2dbe5d8bf730353c0c9", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-050-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-050-PH01-LR1-050-PH02", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "A detailed study of these Kremas resulted in the following information.", "source_text_sha256": "683963308735c92e247546349108b0bff24cd12bba4d9023dcd54c3ea10b80b5", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This transition makes no finding", "candidate_response_sha256": "8b4cbb818adf54cee70aff2fb5f9db95a431313bd23e30637300115be24a55bd", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-050-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-050-PH01-LR1-050-PH02", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "Kremas II and III were mirror image installations consisting of several morgues and a crematory of 15 retorts each. The morgues were in the basement and the crematories on the ground floor. An elevator was utilized for corpse transport from the morgues to the crematory. The included drawings were generated from origina", "source_text_sha256": "aeebacc1f5f3497dbd77c4ea3b136aeab890d203179ad64f94b97df834214ff9", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The basic Crematoria II and III layout is accurately summarized", "candidate_response_sha256": "e9220ead87a99e8ea55df0fbe1fbb04eb9ed97d6065c90ce4b9ee64034ae6fb1", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-050-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-050-PH01-LR1-050-PH02", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 30 ], "source_excerpt": "Uncaptioned Crematoria II/III exterior photograph embedded in the report text.", "source_text_sha256": "63ca15566df37839bf683f583629310afe2b7acfc765c697e321905f75c123ba", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-051-TAB01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-051-TAB01-LR1-052-P01", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 31 ], "source_excerpt": "Table V: Hypothetical execution and crematory usage rates for Kremas II and III.", "source_text_sha256": "82807c2b043aa22112a705e0c298c890c83f12fdfbe80efb23d86a2b56bb1027", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "Table V inherits the same unsupported occupancy and one-week cycle", "candidate_response_sha256": "249a3b80373b9af5d24c949c452c429214c48ecabd25d7c7f331872d1868ad0a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-052-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-051-TAB01-LR1-052-P01", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 31 ], "source_excerpt": "Computed usage rates for Kremas II and III (theoretical and real-time) and alleged execution gas chamber at maximum capacity are set out in Table V.", "source_text_sha256": "da4c8832b462d89cac5817bb84435d529e4f3d99be3696cf5dd7bacb16a7176a", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Table V is a sensitivity calculation mislabeled as historical capacity", "candidate_response_sha256": "3c5defb54dab2b10fb2fa016e3dfc609c1ee8d20292db69d136211a81e5a2306", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 31 ], "source_excerpt": "Based upon statistics, obtained from the Auschwitz State Museum and measurements made at the site, for Kremas IV and V relative to the alleged gas areas, and assuming a ceiling height of 8 feet, the computed statistics are as follows:", "source_text_sha256": "2dd1d6ce7d2da4a3f08267d4dade26fd36cae531fcdff41e0315d11127f8de71", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The announced calculations remain conditional on unverified inputs", "candidate_response_sha256": "73981d587aa87063e78fc8a2945d20b87796635ac445d750a30ee95037ebc6b0", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 32 ], "source_excerpt": "1875 sq. ft.; will hold 209 people. 15,000 cu. ft. will use 3.75 lbs. of Zyklon B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.", "source_text_sha256": "0406e34ebcf83032e17323aa4e98f7f631a80b9429c8ead65408dd8ab2e19813", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The arithmetic is conditional and the occupancy divisor is fictitious", "candidate_response_sha256": "17f50930e747a7a1ffda927eeb180e3e0a0900b9edb659d23a7ece393b47523d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 32 ], "source_excerpt": "5125 sq. ft.; will hold 570 people. 41,000 cu. ft. will use 10.25 lbs. of Zyklon B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.", "source_text_sha256": "1bd71e9706fce9f8764a954a4a0a229ffeb44793cea2d7b63e69f81ad52670f7", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A second calculation repeats the same unsupported premises", "candidate_response_sha256": "652bf0860ddfc04d5e8b491d26c440a909a2689e0bc0a4b9d43b680f57234079", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 32 ], "source_excerpt": "Computed alleged usage rates for Kremas IV and V (theoretical and real-time) and gas chamber at maximum capacity and 1 week ventilation time are set out in Table VI", "source_text_sha256": "5d1b0ca2dcc21940d21822425b0edc6326c51cd2e35a220433c5586fc95ebe25", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Table VI hard-codes the invented one-week closure", "candidate_response_sha256": "28fa1a663548254ee1c8e03bc538778cc3473ea727db95895eb1d592f6116c2d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-TAB01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 32 ], "source_excerpt": "Table VI: Hypothetical execution and crematory usage rates for Kremas IV and V.", "source_text_sha256": "a1b2088066bcf20b225e4a1a6910059c618296ffc76e14146e26ad6acb11c877", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "Table VI treats an assumed weekly cycle as historical capacity", "candidate_response_sha256": "c49b628e1dce0d80b7a1e117eb3aa46f3d95f26a5efe0da8a69f1232a917ed03", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P02", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P05", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-P01-LR1-053-P05", "section": "3.16", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 32 ], "source_excerpt": "The Red and White houses, otherwise designated as Bunker I and II, were alleged to be gas chambers only, and there are no estimates available or statistics on the buildings.", "source_text_sha256": "ab0cd1337b7184d0ac72bb9bdc12eb7fa8fac638a5f38a5d92c1d98a45b5bef6", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Leuchter's lack of estimates is not evidence that the bunkers did not operate", "candidate_response_sha256": "97c4e1f90f32818bd8aadcf0e7db8de148c9b11c70a2830f56bbd1d0144550ed", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-052-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 33 ], "source_excerpt": "Uncaptioned Majdanek aerial image immediately below the section heading.", "source_text_sha256": "04c8b7064b31ad27066771e9e493e10ee53821151f86901ba01862551f96327f", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P06", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 33 ], "source_excerpt": "At Majdanek, there are several facilities of interest: the original crematory, now removed; the crematory with the alleged execution gas chamber, now rebuilt; the Bath and Disinfection Building #2, which was apparently a delousing facility; and Bath and Disinfection Building #1, which contained a shower, delousing and ", "source_text_sha256": "9dc949345d8f0fbf49839543f7bfb2712b8cc9d619bbe6433d36896efa58bae2", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The site inventory is broadly useful, but “experimental” prejudges the gas-chamber building", "candidate_response_sha256": "cd1fe889caddd899dfe3b005a28dfe9703141b655f61d625120bf91720daf61e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 33 ], "source_excerpt": "Outside view of the Majdanek camp.", "source_text_sha256": "c359697c0d411ffe39fd65322ddf1425f0ba0ec96bdad3e0bed7eae6840920ed", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-053-P07", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 33 ], "source_excerpt": "The first free standing crematory, which has been removed, has been discussed earlier. For Bath and Disinfection #2, although closed, an inspection through the windows confirms its function was only a delousing facility, similar to those at Birkenau. The rebuilt crematory and alleged gas chamber, although discussed ear", "source_text_sha256": "06ee6875e2c1f847c350ae1713761505487b05a2f8ec72684b2c5e662ff02b4e", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A view through windows cannot establish exclusive function, and the paragraph conflates structures", "candidate_response_sha256": "647643125ba4d57c45f84dd7e4c8a0ef3302a95b9d3c0f11c52a99230ba20918", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-054-P01", "LR1-054-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-054-PH01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-053-PH01-LR1-054-PH01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 34 ], "source_excerpt": "Crematorium at Majdanek.", "source_text_sha256": "51c744be35be91aa0e3c6b88504e268655081ba86ba7675b4e0ca426b2b617cf", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-054-PH02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "photo", "source_pages": [ 34 ], "source_excerpt": "Alleged gas chamber at Majdanek.", "source_text_sha256": "475f98f6409aa420fab20627ae3ce8889ff069745b0c7728a98565ad14b7f5d3", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "", "candidate_response_sha256": null, "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-054-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 34 ], "source_excerpt": "If this were utilized as a presumed execution chamber, it would hold 90 people, at most, and require 2.0 lbs. of Zyklon B gas. Venting time should be at least one week. Maximum usage execution rate 90 people/week.", "source_text_sha256": "10a90f5580706d0985e395301ff0df710c17313f4899829d448c3c32bc6094f3", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The 90-person and one-week figures simply repeat the Auschwitz assumptions", "candidate_response_sha256": "d2380a525de48988e5b0256c7fe18b81118220689b11fea65ad56a3e7d4453d6", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-054-P01", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-054-P04", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 34, 35 ], "source_excerpt": "The alleged experimental gas chambers, located at Bath and Disinfection Building #1, are a brick building connected to the main facility by a loose wood structure. This building is surrounded on three sides by a depressed concrete walkway. There are two chambers, an unknown area and a control booth, which has two steel", "source_text_sha256": "ae03523fe0ed1c22274a84dc479ea717b7a34ec9f5d60449820848a3e2851041", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The doors, booth, piping, and chamber layout are relevant physical observations", "candidate_response_sha256": "0e63128f9bf752df44099c4457444cca85bf743069c97c93882be28ffdd7012c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-054-P01", "LR1-055-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-055-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 35 ], "source_excerpt": "All four doors have glass peep holes and the two inner doors have chemical test cylinders, to test the air in the chamber. The control booth has an open window of some 6 inches by 10 inches, never having provision for glass or gasketing, barred horizontally and vertically with reinforcing rods and opening into chamber ", "source_text_sha256": "5d378f69682e9080610d667d461d0c311ddbdb77bb3c1d530f7ab75e930a2c36", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Safety and delivery fittings are acknowledged, then discounted without a functional test", "candidate_response_sha256": "a6210c413b824eff4c0fe2576bb535c1700443975ff90645c65769893aeea637", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-054-P02", "LR1-055-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-055-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-054-PH02-LR1-055-P02", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 35 ], "source_excerpt": "The walls are of stucco, the roof and floor are of poured concrete, none of which has been sealed, inside or out. There are two heater circulators built as sheds on the side of the building, one for chamber 31 and the other for something in the Bath and Disinfection facility, forward, (see drawing) neither of which are", "source_text_sha256": "950ef2fd090de9ace686562d29d96ba1835f9b87bfc37e7783635b7efd1f434f", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Blue staining and a heater-circulator show HCN handling despite the supposed missing prerequisites", "candidate_response_sha256": "6978de6d2432b9b19137d336620408a55634b14d7f9e1b352ab239890ef375cb", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "adjacent_answer", "reason": "A neighboring visible correction already answers the same factual or methodological premise. The source remains available, but repeating the answer would add editorial bulk without adding evidence.", "audit_question": "Does every listed visible correction actually cover the distinct assertion in this unit?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-054-P02", "LR1-055-P03" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-P01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P01-LR1-056-TAB01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 35 ], "source_excerpt": "Chamber #1 has an area of 480 sq. ft., a volume of 4240 cubic feet, will hold 54 persons and use one pound of Zyklon B gas. Chamber #2 has an area of 209 sq. ft., a volume of 1850 cubic feet, will hold 24 persons and use 0.5 pounds of Zyklon B gas. Assuming gas chamber usage, the maximum weekly execution rate would hav", "source_text_sha256": "3dc8d0dd7a3f3c840885cd7f38b160de3249caf3ae7982863a32e903a1eed1df", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The room dimensions do not validate the occupancy, dose, or weekly-rate model", "candidate_response_sha256": "dfde909759e1177174c875e673d9814b3297f96f51b3106ed3713734ffe0ef31", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-055-P04", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-TAB01", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P01-LR1-056-TAB01", "section": "3.17", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 36 ], "source_excerpt": "Table VII: Hypothetical execution rates for Majdanek.", "source_text_sha256": "7f4b6bc49e1a6eeb5b5f3dcc4f8a9892aaa37f195fe3e9d6fc25a27edcdade16", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "Table VII is another weekly-rate assumption, not a finding", "candidate_response_sha256": "8f72ffa40c0c87fb24ba98a76d6a37d26782dcf0fc2d75ac802a1654661a200d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-055-P04", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-P02", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P02-LR1-056-P03", "section": "3.18", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 36 ], "source_excerpt": "The statistics set out in Table VIII were generated for this report. Assuming the gas chambers existed (and they did not), these figures represent the maximum 24-hour, 7- day a week outputs of each facility and the amount of Zyklon B gas required.", "source_text_sha256": "9bdc9c7763d404ff7a811d1ff6beeb0ae9bbab2bd53d630bc979d9e442996edd", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Table VIII aggregates outputs from invalid premises", "candidate_response_sha256": "ae99170044bd8012a4db9df83e5dc0da9ad9b275f5ffcbc0c29222da4f07822a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "repeated_calculation", "reason": "The passage or table reruns occupancy, airing, dose, or cremation inputs already tested in a visible correction. Its arithmetic cannot independently validate those inputs.", "audit_question": "Does this unit introduce a new input, constraint, or historical claim that the listed correction does not test?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-055-P04", "LR1-057-TAB01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-P03", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P02-LR1-056-P03", "section": "3.18", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 36 ], "source_excerpt": "Relative to the additional alleged execution facilities of Chelmno (gas vans), Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka and any others, it should be noted that carbon monoxide gas was allegedly used.", "source_text_sha256": "50302fb6dec05f14131c137ec362d9366e845d1ded0410a8e24fcfc8075600c1", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Engine-exhaust killing is historical background outside this inspection", "candidate_response_sha256": "39ea2556cce43c45f2b0a088c3b062007b61c46d234e508d2cb8cfa244d79634", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-P06", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P06-LR1-056-P07", "section": "3.19", "source_kind": "signature_block", "source_pages": [ 38 ], "source_excerpt": "Prepared this 5th day of April, 1988 at Malden, Massachusetts.", "source_text_sha256": "30d19358b4bf129ef906009981b5bc38f75ce9cb1b15bc4c71d5d0ce05820d22", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The date and place authenticate the report's completion, not its method", "candidate_response_sha256": "eb006a6af5f49bbee0ed0924b8aa909a63b35b741f50a9f31098bc1ee3582686", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "LR1-056-P07", "context_group_id": "context-LR1-056-P06-LR1-056-P07", "section": "3.19", "source_kind": "signature_block", "source_pages": [ 38 ], "source_excerpt": "Fred Leuchter Associates Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. Chief Engineer", "source_text_sha256": "b53ca4df5c56d3e3e713520ea48c5c89f2c238c457e6dd74ef627a5b8e0744cb", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "“Chief Engineer” is a business title, not evidence of professional licensure", "candidate_response_sha256": "a683fc772d855e56b00d519b6d7de159944337f92421cbd120541aa04542aae9", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "credential_context", "reason": "The point concerns Leuchter's title, experience, or institutional endorsement rather than a technical premise needed to test the report's conclusions.", "audit_question": "Is the credential claim being used at this point as substantive evidence that requires a direct answer?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-040-DISTRIBUTION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-040-DISTRIBUTION-APP-040-DISTRIBUTION", "section": "A.0", "source_kind": "administrative_block", "source_pages": [ 40 ], "source_excerpt": "[Report sent to:] Ernst Zündel, Institute of Historical Review, and Chancellor Helmut Kohl.", "source_text_sha256": "72a57b98c5fb42ae1296129c63282b647f326d8d5c031d0b15bebef6fb95d571", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The recipient list establishes circulation, not technical validity", "candidate_response_sha256": "8d0d12390a871fa61c7cfc2d8a9705d4319a4bfc2a5acfa89e2519c52c2c3a1b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH", "context_group_id": "context-APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH-APP-042-SAMPLE-GRAPH", "section": "A.2", "source_kind": "graph", "source_pages": [ 42 ], "source_excerpt": "Appendix 2: Sample Analysis Graph. Analysis of brick and mortar samples taken at Auschwitz and Birkenau showing total cyanide; Kremas I, II, III, IV, and V plus a control sample from delousing facility number 1 at Birkenau.", "source_text_sha256": "cdc0d459f80de274e9fb7efe4a3f95e4471c666e46d5785d9758af19aba822c9", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The graph's scale turns an unmatched comparator into visual rhetoric", "candidate_response_sha256": "0bbd706cb4832e7218db8fb3fd540e2aff44bef4b411bea7290168e8ec7ae7f8", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "visual_corroboration", "reason": "The visual restates evidence or assumptions treated in a visible correction. The original visual remains in source order inside report context.", "audit_question": "Does the visual encode a distinct claim that cannot be judged from the listed correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "APP-041-LAB-TABLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 43 ], "source_excerpt": "Boiling point 25°C; freezing point -15°C; specific gravity 0.69; steam density 0.97 (air 1.0); the liquid evaporates easily; liquid transparent and colorless; smell peculiar and repulsively sweet; extraordinarily great penetrative powers; soluble in water.", "source_text_sha256": "b9f4ce2937b23d3deed0440eac619a7deb1460187b81119fda1ffd564f79c11b", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The listed vapor density defeats the report's “heavy gas sinks into trenches” premise", "candidate_response_sha256": "a96653eed943e823f97011885bcd9601fd8e92744e5c623d40592df8b250c812", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-041-P02", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-043-NI9912-EXPLOSION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 43 ], "source_excerpt": "Danger of Explosion: 75 g prussic acid per cubic metre of air. Normal application approximately 8-10 g per cubic metre, therefore not explosive. Prussic acid must not contact flame or glowing wires because it then burns and loses effectiveness.", "source_text_sha256": "c3b92516facaca8fad218d7e9908f62ca75fb03d8053ab73b824930c6ec2880e", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The appendix separates an ordinary dose from the explosion threshold", "candidate_response_sha256": "0df7614bc77362ad4de2da427da147730436bf27d09deba1bb33c7112242e74a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-033-P03", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-043-NI9912-WARM-BLOODED", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 43 ], "source_excerpt": "Because prussic acid has practically no irritant warning effect it is highly toxic and dangerous. One mg per kg body weight is sufficient to kill a human being; susceptibility varies, and birds and fish are particularly susceptible.", "source_text_sha256": "72b9c5fca239594d6417c977ddee6a17425eedcd89b7a65af1eb795bb4caf4f7", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The passage confirms HCN's extreme human toxicity but does not supply a chamber dose model", "candidate_response_sha256": "1cc5d5406cea561b2f2cf2a47974a9b7f1a829f213b47b8e0003c43cc1d68a1a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-043-NI9912-INSECTS", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 43 ], "source_excerpt": "The effect on insects depends less on temperature than other gases: it is effective at low temperatures, even 5°C. Eggs of many insects, particularly bugs and lice, are more susceptible than adults.", "source_text_sha256": "c055ca0c07bf13f3cbaa843d605edc5b556c989bca5875a28a47443013f3c992", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "Boiling point is not a minimum temperature for HCN release or effect", "candidate_response_sha256": "4175b52e0c0234aca69264615e25d195e16a628d639008aade9667f6a81fb532", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-028-P02", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-PLANTS", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Toxic effects on plants depend on vegetation type. Mildew and dry rot are not killed by prussic acid. Prussic acid does not destroy bacteria.", "source_text_sha256": "b9803882ae80929e8a80d29f685db26b0fdc4a9c1924694fdc79d0b5ae85b97f", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "HCN is not a universal disinfectant", "candidate_response_sha256": "d3997291aeb85d040b50240973f9d865f595f657b5f2e808e37c1bcf91257b09", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-METHOD", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Zyklon is a mixture of prussic acid and an irritant absorbed by a carrier. Wood-fibre discs, granular material, or cubes are used. The agents are generated through simple evaporation; cans are used whole; the gaseous acid is harmless to finishes; and Zyklon can be rendered inoffensive by combustion.", "source_text_sha256": "905e0b825106823591f6a633e615df15ce5915eda453c014651fcb6d5f140ec1", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The manual describes simple evaporation from a carrier, not a mandatory hot-air generator", "candidate_response_sha256": "49507be3382b92c8d368fbe5402907bd3824aee51e0eea0f448a6ed6e4a43c5c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-030-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-SLIGHT-POISONING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Slight poisoning: dizziness, headache, vomiting, and sickness pass if the person immediately reaches fresh air. Alcohol reduces resistance, so it should not be consumed before fumigation.", "source_text_sha256": "17ec73d9563b42f5b9dd1eea8db047589b5edb5c682e35ebde92daca8bfefa27", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "First-aid instructions show risk management, not impossibility", "candidate_response_sha256": "d408b2029de2b4bc4be8a0605db0c778021ce63161942de16044ce2eb3449b8d", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-PRESCRIPTION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Prescribe one Cardiazol or Veriazol tablet to prevent heart disorders, repeating after two to three hours if necessary.", "source_text_sha256": "bfa16d53db27e2b5c6eab6f49902faefe3155c2baf2df22d6553f395b1c6b173", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "An obsolete treatment instruction bears no weight on chamber feasibility", "candidate_response_sha256": "32135278eac33d187144482e20b22ef80792e0a683906e41148ddb82836a89ee", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-SEVERE-POISONING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Severe poisoning: collapse and fainting. First aid includes fresh air, removing the mask, loosening clothing, artificial respiration, and Lobelin; do not give camphor injections.", "source_text_sha256": "41561e0555f321fea228ddf2bd6053c5be7bc844d6b085e5b04f89b948893730", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The danger is real; the inference that danger prevents operation is not", "candidate_response_sha256": "427de52d8731f8d5a22f61608e43cfa1bd3d9dc22df4dd15334e4e9358c68517", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-SKIN", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Poisoning through the skin: symptoms and treatment as for slight poisoning.", "source_text_sha256": "b3ae8083816a8fbeafa5fd52940305cbe60738bb622a8f600bdf78c13edd9ece", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Dermal exposure reinforces the need for precautions", "candidate_response_sha256": "02e3dfbba684c3e3d9d4a4bdbb3c531c55624841c6a913ecc54a66acabf11e18", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-044-NI9912-STOMACH", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 44 ], "source_excerpt": "Stomach poisoning: treat with Lobelin, ferrous sulphate, and burnt magnesia.", "source_text_sha256": "0c0c8a75dee175fb4ce56fbadf50c81f1a71bd65486f13c9944694be882f395e", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This historical treatment line does not test the report's engineering claims", "candidate_response_sha256": "095e2371e333499f0f5e261ca464d8c96b2c967b68486032be6bc32c4c6f1e82", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-FILTER", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "When fumigating with Zyklon use special filters, such as the “J” insert. If gas seeps through, leave and change filters after checking mask fit. Never change filters inside gas-filled rooms.", "source_text_sha256": "4c0e007d02ea102f0986808ac64c0dba2aa116d14972ade685f7bd488c7f2a80", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The appendix specifies a purpose-built HCN filter", "candidate_response_sha256": "c7d5d973baef3b2fbaa19650deed44edc0fa6d1b53b0feab4602c6d570d98182", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-034-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-PERSONNEL-ONE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "A disinfestation squad of at least two members is used. The chief is responsible for inspection, airing, release, and safety, appoints a deputy, and must be obeyed.", "source_text_sha256": "4fad10403d78b9bd5bee57c19121a70e8f17b8358772bfd83a55d7bfc8bae307", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The manual's minimum trained team is two, not the large staffing rule invented in the body", "candidate_response_sha256": "0d63fbbde3a4e461d5b69a7cfca0131432e789ebf0966c96ed94ac76b5a6d874", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-PERSONNEL-TWO", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "Untrained or uncertified personnel may not work on gassing or enter gas-filled rooms. Each person must prove official authorization to use prussic acid for extermination.", "source_text_sha256": "f03ab2cd108a38216268a2c5fee03e120c872da6f8d2708610967c9856a0b9a8", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Training and authorization are sensible controls, not evidence that wartime use left modern licenses", "candidate_response_sha256": "5d8347497468e3ae5671374078dae3dd00ab892b8bdbe9bfe00561734ae9ead1", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-MEMBER-EQUIPMENT", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "Each member carries a gas mask, at least two special filters, the first-aid leaflet, the work order, and an authorization certificate.", "source_text_sha256": "1f5c742aba2b6c5b39145acbc9b63a49dc127f409346613e16b584942f063eb6", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The equipment list shows an operational safety system", "candidate_response_sha256": "49d9364ca40e5239a3a6b8952dbb79c72e0518b3b2ca08c12d708606b573b067", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-SQUAD-EQUIPMENT", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "Each squad carries spare filters, a gas detector, resuscitation equipment and medicines, a can-opening tool, warning signs, sealing material, paper pads, and a flashlight.", "source_text_sha256": "4ee12617c3cd8ff90da529342cfce291dcde3b583779489cff054d1e7cecdfd8", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Gas detection and temporary sealing are explicit—not absent technologies", "candidate_response_sha256": "5cbea9077e98b7fdd7681700a6a9efd007d8f8881c0988a8088e39b1f31db30b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-045-NI9912-UPKEEP", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 45 ], "source_excerpt": "Equipment must be kept clean and in good order, and damage repaired at once.", "source_text_sha256": "f251331983a39fb27950b20944ce230777d966c35bbb60304d7ec26e78d8265e", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Equipment maintenance is prudent but proves no historical conclusion", "candidate_response_sha256": "e9470f40748cd42a83c358d8b4551775b980db0facc2679f26e159cd052ec52b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-046-NI9912-PLANNING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 46 ], "source_excerpt": "Planning asks whether the building can be fumigated, considering type, situation, roof, windows, shafts and wall breaks; identifies the vermin; measures volume; removes people, animals, plants and food; identifies difficult openings to seal; sets safety measures, date, neighborhood precautions, and official notice.", "source_text_sha256": "69e59011913f048aad4def4692511f3dbb3660aa5cf77700358ddd215b02d203", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The manual contemplates ordinary buildings with imperfect openings", "candidate_response_sha256": "5d3b5f2546be1f6277f7f50a5694b6147dedc0ce20118c6ba97f37f8762aea6c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-046-NI9912-PREPARATION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 46 ], "source_excerpt": "Preparation begins “Seal,” then opens enclosed spaces, separates bedding, removes liquids, food, plants, animals, film, medicines and mask filters, prepares result checks, clears personnel, and takes every door key.", "source_text_sha256": "949e03f397d371f20d7dc6b2acc7974fe0d7a6055a301cb86c3f7b31aa0e6e81", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "Preparation begins with temporary sealing, not reconstruction as a pressure vessel", "candidate_response_sha256": "749fb7a0a821b3c14b8215897ef4c86212edc225fd22d43b71fc3953fbf8ee36", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-046-NI9912-TIME", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "cross_page_paragraph", "source_pages": [ 46, 47 ], "source_excerpt": "Gas strength and exposure time depend on vermin, temperature, furniture, and building imperviousness. Above 5°C the customary dose is 8 g/m³ and time 16 hours, reducible to six hours in warm weather and extended to 32 hours below 5°C. Clothes moths require different conditions.", "source_text_sha256": "b6c2bd4585faf7d964b1feaea48c7a2c85d363b11c119c3e0e3452070d69a053", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The appendix makes time conditional—and its hours are for killing insect life stages", "candidate_response_sha256": "4a7671c026d43cf6ed8061f8f478b7953ec592361f18ccd0cf16775c16523803", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-028-P02", "LR1-029-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-047-NI9912-FUMIGATION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 47 ], "source_excerpt": "Fumigation items 1-12: clear and seal the building; prepare and distribute cans and pads by floor; dismiss the work detachment; post a guard; put on gas masks; open the cans and spread the contents thinly for rapid evaporation; lock and seal the exit; post poison-gas warnings; keep masks, resuscitation gear, and gas de", "source_text_sha256": "5d8e470015c750f0c352510283ef800827f1fcc74c54920741dbf1c66dbf2798", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The complete sequence uses portable controls and rapid evaporation—not a hot-air generator", "candidate_response_sha256": "d414104df09567b87105ef94b2097e20305f836ce165022caf351a9794f2e955", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-030-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-047-NI9912-AIRING-INTRO", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 47 ], "source_excerpt": "Airing presents the greatest danger and must be done carefully with a gas mask. The operator keeps pure air close and directs escaping gas away from others; a trained observer may watch wind direction.", "source_text_sha256": "f63f13f13571c99da2aa30dc4b0b3581d7f63c7121de36b1fae2ffbe8ea04635", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The manual explicitly provides for masked entry during airing", "candidate_response_sha256": "a0aa9fe5da4093499c7d51c6454c84052e08488c5b38e2efc71095ee92951cc6", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "LR1-034-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-048-NI9912-AIRING-LIST", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 48 ], "source_excerpt": "Airing items 1-13: exclude strangers; post guards; wear a mask; enter and open windows and doors floor by floor; remove seals after most gas disperses; protect pipes; secure valuables and openings; remove chimney covers after provisional release; continue airing for at least 20 hours while the guard remains.", "source_text_sha256": "91476c258e9b7a582921d5505a387e3bc7ef69efb263506788100ca2e22bd18a", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The 20-hour rule belongs to a furnished building intended for ordinary reoccupation", "candidate_response_sha256": "6ad75bfcd5c685815a89dad9a7087216f30c879dbb2c2b9f415239cab3d9f0c1", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-048-NI9912-PROVISIONAL-RELEASE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 48 ], "source_excerpt": "A room may be provisionally released when detector paper is lighter than the reference with doors and windows open. Only airing and cleanup work is allowed; no one may rest or sleep there and openings remain open.", "source_text_sha256": "4ce3a22ea88d31d6612c0a3bbde70df5cf78f47f0bfe0097691fafbbd8efa887", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Release is measured with a detector, not guessed from odor or elapsed time alone", "candidate_response_sha256": "2590918e28f4371c57f2d352bf24dc83ca9163c4f44edb9ba7827cb402550245", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-048-NI9912-CLEANUP", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "cross_page_list_block", "source_pages": [ 48, 49 ], "source_excerpt": "Cleanup removes carrier remains and damaged cans, airs and beats mattresses and upholstered goods for at least an hour, and changes straw stuffing where possible. Chimney covers must be removed to avoid inadequate stove draft and carbon-monoxide poisoning. After release, the chief records room volume, Zyklon quantity, ", "source_text_sha256": "836bf8a56b9242a005d90c1d56ee6c52c7582e1a3e1e2bf5511035bbba2388fc", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "Soft furnishings drive the long cleanup—and the same appendix refutes the CO pressure claim", "candidate_response_sha256": "193cbdf5efe877051724ade67ac4b84aff446a9e0c1bb0e2010e0ac40ab66627", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "LR1-056-P04", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-049-NI9912-FINAL-RELEASE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 49 ], "source_excerpt": "Final release occurs no sooner than 21 hours after airing starts; soft goods return, the room is closed for an hour and heated where possible, difficult locations are detector-tested, sleeping rooms receive special checks, and the chief stays until the last room is released.", "source_text_sha256": "4f2f526a350fb8673857712fd689a288ec301b20d7894cea3d40803d212da9bb", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Twenty-one hours protects later sleepers and porous contents; it is not a universal killing-cycle minimum", "candidate_response_sha256": "fc5b9ddf753f2e77c2660017065a216ffa55b745b975e20f130f9d5c16472e6c", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-029-P01", "APP-043-NI9912-TITLE" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-043-NI9912-PROPERTIES-APP-049-NI9912-CERTIFICATE", "section": "A.3", "source_kind": "certification_block", "source_pages": [ 49 ], "source_excerpt": "Issued by the Health Institution of the Protectorate Bohemia and Moravia in Prague. Dorothea L. Galewski certifies the English as a true translation of NI-9912.", "source_text_sha256": "cc5e6dcaa82a0207f7f5f88ef12ec57a78ac960f0751b4ab05f74def382b19a0", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The certificate authenticates the translation, not Leuchter's use of it", "candidate_response_sha256": "ecde44c370e63b83d53da358c81218fad664393fbedf5ec2a764c2f997517039", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP", "context_group_id": "context-APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP-APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP", "section": "A.4", "source_kind": "map", "source_pages": [ 50 ], "source_excerpt": "Appendix 4 (1): Auschwitz map, marking the entrance and Krema I.", "source_text_sha256": "1c9c057980ae802d5cfe4e3ff0e4b395050899c39ec32db9ad41c5e892f770e1", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The map orients the reader but does not reconstruct Krema I's wartime state", "candidate_response_sha256": "a9e36c17baa385350fdcfb4952dc55b353bf6ca2310b7fd7f9928dcd5b3952b0", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-051-BIRKENAU-MAP", "context_group_id": "context-APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP-APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP", "section": "A.4", "source_kind": "map", "source_pages": [ 51 ], "source_excerpt": "Appendix 4 (2): Birkenau map, marking Kremas II-V, burning pits, red-and-white houses, and delousing facility number 1.", "source_text_sha256": "635d1182e26c8ebc3fb67a76374e35db0c542176eb4fbe56fb245c2d780566d8", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The map records relevant locations—including the burning pits the body dismisses", "candidate_response_sha256": "36ca77fd5c9680fecd11ac8ce0c9cdc2b282d08d324219efc0ae227fbd4c08ed", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP", "context_group_id": "context-APP-050-AUSCHWITZ-MAP-APP-052-MAJDANEK-MAP", "section": "A.4", "source_kind": "map", "source_pages": [ 52 ], "source_excerpt": "Appendix 4 (3): Majdanek map, marking bath/disinfection buildings and the old and new crematoria.", "source_text_sha256": "0a7b522a7aa22cc05cb1642c87eef677ba22bfd52b933565ae7fb3efa051b5f9", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The map distinguishes facilities but cannot decide their functions", "candidate_response_sha256": "33c8e7733459b6f850eb61c94a42c05d3c069b49403c314e6dcc477b3bebcc79", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-053-DRAWING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-053-DRAWING-APP-054-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "source_kind": "drawing", "source_pages": [ 53 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital witness labels this “Appendix 5 (1): Krema I,” while the embedded Leuchter drawing is titled “Delousing Chamber / Experimental Gas Chamber, Bath & Disinfection Building #1, Majdanek” and depicts an unknown heater/circulator.", "source_text_sha256": "48db95a889e9f4e90cd7e344aa53359dc1b35b8e747a90e0b82278d9b54c8c48", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The outer caption and embedded drawing do not match in this digital witness", "candidate_response_sha256": "c8769e3b5fd99673d0c53a094c3a3a890c560589a30661d515a9c78abf55c92e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-054-DRAWING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-053-DRAWING-APP-054-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "source_kind": "drawing", "source_pages": [ 54 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital witness labels this “Appendix 5 (2): Krema II,” while the embedded drawing is titled “Experimental Gas Chambers (Delousing), Bath & Disinfection Building, Majdanek” and labels CO cylinders and heater/circulators.", "source_text_sha256": "3f8243083ca2ed8c1466b786cc1d198d8990d34362314acceca632e042f9b4b2", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The plan depicts Majdanek delousing equipment, not Birkenau Krema II", "candidate_response_sha256": "e24a9502b340282e20fa7e172e9dfe26cce385aabe9b3cf92112bee65729153e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-056-DRAWING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-056-DRAWING-APP-058-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "source_kind": "drawing", "source_pages": [ 56 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital witness labels this “Appendix 5 (4): Krema IV,” while the drawing title block reads “Krema 2, Birkenau” and marks “roof vent? (4)” above the basement room.", "source_text_sha256": "dbb7853d06f6df1af24af586d48f4ed92aa5af69d14d760d17e516f1bd7a3a97", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "Leuchter's Krema II drawing marks four roof openings", "candidate_response_sha256": "5e398abd76f3879ea1eb155352b2418e6ed6f0a574e05d8f8ef5cb75985539da", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "visual_corroboration", "reason": "The visual restates evidence or assumptions treated in a visible correction. The original visual remains in source order inside report context.", "audit_question": "Does the visual encode a distinct claim that cannot be judged from the listed correction?", "covered_by": [ "APP-055-DRAWING", "LR1-051-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-057-DRAWING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-056-DRAWING-APP-058-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "source_kind": "drawing", "source_pages": [ 57 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital witness labels this “Appendix 5 (5): Krema V,” while the drawing title block reads “Krema 3, Birkenau” and marks “roof vent? (4)” above the basement room.", "source_text_sha256": "0b7a1845483cfae31c19987be035449578b2e7b923c315fe8281a00c10ae231c", "underlying_verdict": "Contradicts report", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Self-contradicted", "candidate_headline": "The same unresolved four-opening evidence appears on the Krema III drawing", "candidate_response_sha256": "54bd8cb389d6aa599624e124d2864d9b2a08d90fcfc85485753adf5be796d42f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "visual_corroboration", "reason": "The visual restates evidence or assumptions treated in a visible correction. The original visual remains in source order inside report context.", "audit_question": "Does the visual encode a distinct claim that cannot be judged from the listed correction?", "covered_by": [ "APP-055-DRAWING", "LR1-051-P01" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-058-DRAWING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-056-DRAWING-APP-058-DRAWING", "section": "A.5", "source_kind": "drawing", "source_pages": [ 58 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital witness labels this “Appendix 5 (6): Delousing Chamber and Experimental Gas Chamber … Majdanek,” while the embedded paired plans are the remaining Birkenau crematorium drawings.", "source_text_sha256": "bbff6775d3982a80072aaaa98b0f90d3dc04ecbe8e5def09f338f71ff8d1f429", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The final outer caption is shifted away from the underlying crematorium plans", "candidate_response_sha256": "6924fb8c5da5df68cd3405d2e12bf04ba99921911347ca24d9f0c20bd1909b0b", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-059-LETTER-HEADER", "context_group_id": "context-APP-059-LETTER-HEADER-APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.6", "source_kind": "letter_header", "source_pages": [ 59 ], "source_excerpt": "Fred A. Leuchter Associates letter to Ernst Zündel, dated May 14, 1988, described as clarification of the Krema II and Krema III drawings.", "source_text_sha256": "a1ffaa82053a35fa36138d80c0b004c56e33371ce69cfc02e1a4011d00542bfe", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "This is a post-report clarification, not contemporaneous wartime evidence", "candidate_response_sha256": "9a58ceb930caca9b3bddfd1348b86439b8c8cc15d114d9f6278e5d68ecaf931a", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-059-LETTER-OPENING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-059-LETTER-HEADER-APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 59 ], "source_excerpt": "“I am writing to advise you of a clarification on the drawings of Krema II and Krema III as submitted with my report of April 5, 1968.”", "source_text_sha256": "a75e5d6fbc743e7d9a890f09eba21e0c9f0eecb4c3e953e7975dd97012c50f8a", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The visible “1968” is an obvious date error", "candidate_response_sha256": "fb653d8acf10b010c6ce8f64e9d71836c1ac93c755b6edcad7e30ab0e0ecf54e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-059-LETTER-VENTS", "context_group_id": "context-APP-059-LETTER-HEADER-APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.6", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 59 ], "source_excerpt": "Both drawings indicate roof vents “for reference only,” based on museum material. Leuchter calls them spurious and says visual inspection clearly shows that no roof vent ever existed at either facility.", "source_text_sha256": "6cd768df27180feb4c32fef95c7ec3bdb857af264cffa9a9a47f6ac568e01e2a", "underlying_verdict": "False", "public_verdict_if_shown": "False", "candidate_headline": "A 1988 look at demolished roofs cannot prove that no opening ever existed", "candidate_response_sha256": "c6c057b3060f0cfdaac206a512cf8cb8b9b222e068367b978af94f2d0595a27e", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-051-P01", "LR1-052-P02" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-059-LETTER-HEADER-APP-059-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.6", "source_kind": "signature_block", "source_pages": [ 59 ], "source_excerpt": "Very truly yours, Fred A. Leuchter Associates; Fred A. Leuchter Jr., Chief Engineer.", "source_text_sha256": "6ef2b53c484cc34d99f88cfc57bfc2309188e811e125a2084595bbf89ad57d53", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "“Chief Engineer” remains a company title, not proof of professional registration", "candidate_response_sha256": "9182ee076d045e08e99027808bb58cdcaaff803717161c67aa12790ec958f492", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "credential_context", "reason": "The point concerns Leuchter's title, experience, or institutional endorsement rather than a technical premise needed to test the report's conclusions.", "audit_question": "Is the credential claim being used at this point as substantive evidence that requires a direct answer?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER", "context_group_id": "context-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING", "section": "A.7", "source_kind": "letter_header", "source_pages": [ 60 ], "source_excerpt": "Letter of January 13, 1988, from Bill M. Armontrout, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary, to Barbara Kulaszka.", "source_text_sha256": "d2d78ceb8c601ab0e66ad3dec980289a4eba77422835df0da4af64250ffb3563", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The letter establishes the recommendation's date and official author", "candidate_response_sha256": "c1bc73ce869d40e8b73b2e37098f5fb565c1f1cf97a9ef030d6f51eb354aefdb", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-RECOMMENDATION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING", "section": "A.7", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 60 ], "source_excerpt": "Armontrout recommends Fred A. Leuchter regarding execution by gas chambers, calls him an engineer specializing in gas chambers and executions, says he is well versed, and calls him the only United States consultant Armontrout knows.", "source_text_sha256": "955a962638154c961040a7efd1cce609ca5c1ec85d450ae281278548a2ef7c5e", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A warden's recommendation is not an engineering license or cross-disciplinary qualification", "candidate_response_sha256": "9fffcf7d61a783db7a6b01cb0695bea84b846b012655937106d5f2ed00e605a2", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "credential_context", "reason": "The point concerns Leuchter's title, experience, or institutional endorsement rather than a technical premise needed to test the report's conclusions.", "audit_question": "Is the credential claim being used at this point as substantive evidence that requires a direct answer?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-HEADER-APP-060-ARMONTROUT-CLOSING", "section": "A.7", "source_kind": "paragraph_and_signature", "source_pages": [ 60 ], "source_excerpt": "Armontrout offers further assistance and signs the letter as warden.", "source_text_sha256": "1a3b245c772a05d524186ac6afb730087a6c274928d34d989671ae2a3d2e92a6", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The offer and signature authenticate the recommendation, not the report's conclusions", "candidate_response_sha256": "64ae09352a0d9a72cd76e6425170d23ffd74a902dbe544c45461e128045d475f", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-DATE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-DATE-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-OPENING", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "letter_header", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "The digital heading dates the letter March 9, 1998; the reproduced letter itself is dated March 9, 1988.", "source_text_sha256": "adc24e816330fdc3aff62ef0204db35bc00f5f88006d8433400f8abfeb1860b1", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The outer 1998 date is another digital-witness heading error", "candidate_response_sha256": "037af7167c5572df3a5a767fdbe67b12a69241d223c4e880d4e9c73c6eb302ab", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-OPENING", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-DATE-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-OPENING", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "Enclosed are 32 material samples. All are for determination of “cyanate residue” except sample 12, which is for identification of the material.", "source_text_sha256": "502028502d0e1aaa3ae037e69cd5177db3df9c4883a483890c4b6456131816f4", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "The requested analyte is repeatedly called cyanate, while the laboratory reports total cyanide", "candidate_response_sha256": "4d06cabb88e0d4763dd10873f9af7a6c17260c2990dcd5c6bc8fb4f090b2b3de", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "Sample 12 is gasket material; determine composition.", "source_text_sha256": "5e20f93cd81e774c1d1a0fe57aec01d5eaf97d271051571934ab712331dfe9c4", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Identifying gasket material is a legitimate request but does not validate the cyanide study", "candidate_response_sha256": "7429c1832a53a52b69d2425b58928a1b58c585091117845ba10e3ebb603468b8", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE7", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "Sample 7 is sediment material; determine “cyanate content.”", "source_text_sha256": "5781f8ecdaa3e3afe2c37a0c0c8e67d3466a992a9611f70004750a2c0d2c6041", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "A sediment result without provenance or geometry is uninterpretable", "candidate_response_sha256": "e17c195c4ac994a77530b7d9d3f045bc5ddb66b55d2508d1470c8d6922a3d6a3", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE-LIST", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "Samples 1-11 and 13-32 are brick, mortar, and sediment, requested for “cyanate content.”", "source_text_sha256": "2a24eca8b5721186cc65ad7be3df96ad5a0dba8480df901800254ea33bba0343", "underlying_verdict": "Invalid method", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Invalid method", "candidate_headline": "Material type is not a chain of provenance", "candidate_response_sha256": "b99917ae5c0d9c0934bf17f880587d3f8308b5604ec8d32e30c1c85aefe1c603", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-LITIGATION", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "“Test results for court litigation. Please certify.”", "source_text_sha256": "bcd07a0f67fe2bc160ca7e8e04e40d8e2fd3a92b351427a6285536a91a782e6f", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Disclosing litigation and requesting certification are proper; neither cures design bias", "candidate_response_sha256": "3c97bcc2099b0ee629ecd8db0145b1b0a5d2f44303a455f4227ab6144306e161", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-STORAGE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "The letter says all samples were stored in cool, damp, and sunlight-free locations.", "source_text_sha256": "c9d387ce366a22cc4a80a0fcef6e25a517e299a3ba8fc8f8a8c1ed9d06433c9e", "underlying_verdict": "Unsupported", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A one-line storage assurance is not a reconstructable chain of custody", "candidate_response_sha256": "9eb9863adb284e3552258130f1546ed8a95a1bd6e9e5663b41fc9159fa43f952", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SPEED", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "paragraph", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "“Please complete analysis as soon as possible.”", "source_text_sha256": "70d39d5d155a38c271190a4ce6dbbf6f68a1cdeec02076ca2c24b5a2c8b83484", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "A request for speed is not, by itself, evidence of bad analysis", "candidate_response_sha256": "502931686b6951e89ab64c303b9a760635aa754869b19ebfd2c456d8198556a2", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE12-APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.8", "source_kind": "signature_block", "source_pages": [ 61 ], "source_excerpt": "Fred A. Leuchter signs for Fred A. Leuchter Associates as “Chief Engineer.”", "source_text_sha256": "ddbb9d7d3f1516993f30656f7f718a6bf26c5dd0e22e98e54686f95271e8cca5", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The title adds no chemical qualification", "candidate_response_sha256": "80579dda1424ce8b96c1f1c481616aa2f16a8e48ca32fd16ac91373c21569690", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "credential_context", "reason": "The point concerns Leuchter's title, experience, or institutional endorsement rather than a technical premise needed to test the report's conclusions.", "audit_question": "Is the credential claim being used at this point as substantive evidence that requires a direct answer?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-TITLE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "certificate_header", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering: “Certification for Chemical Analysis of Waters.”", "source_text_sha256": "012b256001e8c6a2ec477ba387742ccda2cd1f9f6f092aaf1ce182ef85d777a9", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The certificate says “analysis of waters,” not forensic analysis of historic masonry", "candidate_response_sha256": "e20f9022a1daf60fefc844cbe15ff6b8070a66bdc3dd5af2301097d27b8da098", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-LAB", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "certificate_block", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "Alpha Analytical Labs, laboratory MAD86, director Scott McLean; certificate dated March 15, 1988 and expiring September 15, 1988.", "source_text_sha256": "4c248ac012bd969d1f6637a0aa868a86b67e1b5e63d342ed8d0e6394a625a72c", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The laboratory identity and dates support ordinary analytical provenance", "candidate_response_sha256": "4e3bb5b4db7c8369ff4673f622b924c04f1587fd2e27d77db76cf31fa4aab7f4", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-PRIMARY", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "Primary drinking-water parameters: full certification for listed metals and organics; provisional certification for pesticides.", "source_text_sha256": "c70822a7722dd3dc33c26ba916eb8b088fdfacca2f2a1e3618431e23c7700ec6", "underlying_verdict": "Accurate but irrelevant", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The drinking-water categories do not validate the masonry inference", "candidate_response_sha256": "454ab6cadf77d19e0bd5c0eb12d8da23cacbc830d31a1de1a3c1d67419c4e929", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "accurate_context", "reason": "The unit is accurate or immaterial to the report's conclusion, so a standalone response would interrupt the reading route without correcting a consequential assertion.", "audit_question": "Has later research made this contextual passage consequential to a visible argument?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-SECONDARY", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "list_block", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "Secondary parameters: full certification includes cyanide among metals, minerals, nutrients, PCB, pesticides, organics, and phenolics; no provisional categories.", "source_text_sha256": "37431ee23527459eab832f513ae448f434a08f17dd9e91ef14c5074989fcce40", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "Cyanide is within the listed category; cyanate is not what the certificate says", "candidate_response_sha256": "2a414ad177f2b89c4aa8f15b2bd0cdb07ad7cfd49cc4cb1a168a6c5bee949ed8", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-SCOPE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "paragraphs", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "The department will accept results for the listed categories. Analyses outside the authorization may cause revocation; the original certificate must be displayed and remains subject to approval.", "source_text_sha256": "d227a67f5e64e9a00a712bc8aca1f19d0dd0b5fe05950cb6eeb97f5fd8c126da", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "State acceptance within listed categories is not endorsement of this litigation experiment", "candidate_response_sha256": "9a6618f2a79684d1534e55331609a02894d7b658c65bd5a7ca7e983e5d770baf", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "appendix_corroboration", "reason": "This appendix fragment serves as corroborating evidence for a visible body or appendix correction. A second standalone response would restate the same internal check.", "audit_question": "Does the fragment contain a distinct contradiction or methodological defect not preserved at the listed visible correction?", "covered_by": [ "LR1-045-P01", "LR1-046-P02", "APP-061-LAB-LETTER-SAMPLE32" ], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" }, { "unit_id": "APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-062-CERT-TITLE-APP-062-CERT-SIGNATURE", "section": "A.9", "source_kind": "signature_block", "source_pages": [ 62 ], "source_excerpt": "Signed by Joseph E. O'Brien, Ph.D., Director of Laboratory Certification, for the commissioner.", "source_text_sha256": "419393423cd2f0047a27eb7b075b556fb93508bf0e716637782ba4348da32066", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The signature authenticates the certification within its stated scope", "candidate_response_sha256": "6d7f326a323bbacaf4bd4828b41a43ed23ae28c0f9cb8fda3e0802cec434f0e6", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-063-L022-TITLE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-063-L022-TITLE-APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE", "section": "A.10", "source_kind": "title_page", "source_pages": [ 63 ], "source_excerpt": "Appendix 10: Document International Military Tribunal, document L-022.", "source_text_sha256": "3db19c530795eca5c084c6e478e3893f60bd267e44809ef9a0cae97fc9100cb4", "underlying_verdict": "Administrative", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The title page identifies an IMT exhibit but makes no technical claim", "candidate_response_sha256": "10dbcd38db369e8af9919d14c597eb8a300715dab28e0559a4e6b7da77594869", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "administrative_source", "reason": "The unit is title matter, a section label, a bibliography fragment, or other administrative source material with no independent factual claim requiring a correction.", "audit_question": "Does the unit contain a factual assertion that was misclassified as administrative?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-064-L022-NOTE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-063-L022-TITLE-APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE", "section": "A.10", "source_kind": "document_note", "source_pages": [ 64 ], "source_excerpt": "Explanatory note: an offset-printed exhibit in United States State Department archives; a report based on accounts of escaped camp inmates, two young Slovakian Jews and a Polish major; Executive Office of the President, War Refugee Board, Washington, D.C.", "source_text_sha256": "2d480c52a6be97e596ba2f6d82d1ee621dbda2913fdf6f821c69ab63437401c4", "underlying_verdict": "Partly correct", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The note accurately identifies an early wartime report based on escapee testimony", "candidate_response_sha256": "012288a2394de1979312b302fb6c8aa8377f17965645e245685fcf6b7a2e1d68", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "no_main_route_correction", "basis": "verdict_visibility_rule", "reason_code": "qualified_context", "reason": "The passage has a valid descriptive core. Its limitation is either apparent from the surrounding visible correction or does not warrant a separate interruption in the main reading route.", "audit_question": "Does the omitted qualification correct a distinct load-bearing premise rather than repeat nearby coverage?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "none" }, { "unit_id": "APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE", "context_group_id": "context-APP-063-L022-TITLE-APP-064-L022-ESTIMATE", "section": "A.10", "source_kind": "table", "source_pages": [ 64 ], "source_excerpt": "A “careful estimate” of Jews gassed at Birkenau from April 1942 to April 1944 by country of origin, totaling approximately 1,765,000.", "source_text_sha256": "4cba43f3a136e8e6b995d3541a728e78b90bc7153dcc0445b36344867e3b62a1", "underlying_verdict": "Misleading", "public_verdict_if_shown": "Unsupported", "candidate_headline": "The 1.765-million estimate is superseded; its revision does not erase the killing process", "candidate_response_sha256": "bc53449ee40caf60fc114ae11cebd296922ef27cb4c2d056a38409e1d6944141", "decision": "collapse_source_as_report_context", "correction_decision": "suppress_candidate_correction", "basis": "manual_correction_suppression", "reason_code": "peripheral_side_issue", "reason": "The criticism is supportable but peripheral to the report's chemical, engineering, documentary, or capacity case. It is retained for audit without competing with the main evidentiary route.", "audit_question": "Would omitting the response leave a consequential historical or technical inference unanswered?", "covered_by": [], "risk_flag": "overrides_substantive_visibility_rule" } ] }